Welcome to part 2. I blogged about POV here, a few weeks ago. Point of view is complicated. Aside from the POV within the story–which I mentioned in part 1–there’s the POV of the author of the story, script, whatever. For the purpose of this post, let’s stick with books and feature films. I can speak with the most knowledge about those and it will be less confusing.
You can tell a lot about the author from his or her story.
First off, the education of the author is usually obvious by the subject matter and/or the vocabulary. If I read a book and I can’t go a full page without learning a new word, I know that the writer is very educated, either because they read a lot or they had a lot of school. If the book or movie is about a bunch of college professors sitting around talking, the writer is probably well-acquainted with college professors. And if they aren’t, the book or movie will suffer.
I often think that education and little-known words can be a weakness. It’s not the words you know, it’s the way you use the words you know. Here’s some of the best book writers that I know of: Terry Pratchett, Neil Gaiman, John Green, Timothy Zahn, Sarah Dessen, Jasper Fforde and Jane Austen. Some of them speak at a higher level, most of them just know how to use words.
Secondly, you can tell what is important to the author, or what she is passionate about, or what is bothering her, or what she wants to change about the world. How? Ever notice that every single movie (aside from the Batman franchise, but even that is arguable) that Christopher Nolan has made is inherently about the same thing?
Reality. What is reality. What do we want from reality? Is reality something we get to choose or does it already exist? Does the audience ever really know what’s real in most of his films?
Nolan is captured by this idea of real vs made-up and it comes out in each of his stories. Inception, which is about the dreamworld. Memento, which is about how a guy with memory loss sees the world. The Prestige, which is about magicians who can create a reality for the audience (and other reasons that are spoilers so I won’t mention them). And even The Dark Knight, which is about choosing to let people decide the reality that they want.
Let’s get another example that isn’t Nolan, eh? Let’s talk about J.J. Abrams. Abrams is best known at the moment for Star Trek: Into Darkness. It’s fantastic, drop what you’re doing and go see it.
Hello, nice to see you again. It was awesome, wasn’t it? Good. Abrams is the man behind Mission Impossible 3, Super 8, Star Trek (2009) and Star Trek: Into Darkness. At the heart of these movies, and even including Armageddon, which he wrote and Michael Bay directed, is the idea of family. The family you create, the family you have, and the family you want. In MI3, Ethan Hunt wants to settle down and get married, which changes the way he works. In Super 8, the relationship between father and son is strained because the mom is dead. The son looks to friends and a girl to be his family. In Star Trek, Kirk’s family is non-existent, until he joins Starfleet and acquires his ship and a father figure. In Star Trek: Into Darkness, Kirk’s crew, and the crew of another major character, are mentioned as being family. And what the characters would do for their families is a major plot point later on.
Thirdly and lastly, you can tell the audience that the writer is aiming to please. This doesn’t mean that other audiences can’t enjoy the work. It’s just the aim.
For example, Suzanne Collins wrote The Hunger Games trilogy for boys. Stop right there and don’t hate me. I know she wrote this trilogy primarily for boys because it is extremely and graphically violent, preoccupied with action over emotion, lacks excessive description, the main character is not concerned with girly things, but hunts and fights, and the ending is less than happy. But there’s a love triangle, you say. Whatever. Just because it’s written primarily for a male audience doesn’t mean that the audience is all males.
Here’s a fun example: Stephenie Meyer. We all know what she wrote, right? It’s only 4 books and 5 movies. Think vampires. Yup, she wrote the Twilight books. Now, I didn’t read these books. Not interested. But I saw 4 of the movies. From a filmmaking perspective, the movies were well-made. Anyway. These books were written with primarily a female audience in mind. I bet you already knew that. Why? Because they contain overly emotional relationships, complications to the plot that are relationship driven, a drawn-out love triangle with 2 seemingly perfect men, anticlimactic scenes, an imperfect and girly main character (someone to relate to), a very neatly bound and happy ending.
It’s funny, until the movies came out, the only people I knew who had read these books were guys.
Good grief this is the longest post ever. If you made it this far, congratulations! You are now in possession of my POV on writer’s POVs and how you can identify them. You can tell a writer’s education, passion, and audience from his or her writing. And many, many other things. Watch out for them as you read.
This list probably says a lot about me…